COMPARE · Reviewed July 6, 2026

EAT vs MELI

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EAT scored 75.7, MELI scored 79.9 — MELI ahead by 4.2.
Compare another pair
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
Restaurants · Quality-Growth
75.7
$176.28 · $7.6B
Score gap
4.2
MELI leads
MELI
MercadoLibre, Inc.
Internet Retail · Quality-Growth
79.9
$1,805.68 · $91.5B
EAT
stronger →← stronger
MELI
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
100
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
MELI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
EAT
MELI
$504mC+
FCF
$11.8bA-
+21.9%A-
Rev
+34.3%A
4.31D
D/E
1.70C+
17.2xB+
P/E
47.6xC
0.89B+
PEG
1.09B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
EAT
MELI
8% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
58% below
-8%
1-yr DCF upside
+81%
+8%
5-yr DCF upside
+137%
+36%
10-yr DCF upside
+246%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
EAT
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
MELI
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
EATBrinker International, Inc.
Restaurants · $176.28 · beta 1.25
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $7.6b. 3% off the 52-week high of $182.20. Revenue growing +22%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.89 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $185.89 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 109% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 4.31 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
MELIMercadoLibre, Inc.
Internet Retail · $1,805.68 · beta 1.34
Why now
Internet Retail · market cap $91.5b. Down 29% from 52-week high of $2548.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +34% — in hypergrowth territory. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $2,209 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong. $91.5b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 48x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. E-commerce competition — Amazon, Walmart, Shein, and Temu have each forced the rest of the category to compete on price, fulfillment speed, or assortment; sustaining margins requires one of those being structurally defended.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.