COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
EAT vs LVS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EAT scored 67.4, LVS scored 66.6 — EAT leads.
Compare another set
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
67.4
$207.55 · $8.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.8
EAT leads
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
66.6
$49.55 · $32.1B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EAT
stronger →← stronger
LVS
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
85
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
64
LVS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EAT
LVS
$504mC+
FCF
$2.7bB
+11.8%B
Rev
+18.1%B+
4.31D
D/E
—
20.2xB
P/E
19.2xB+
1.42B
PEG
1.13B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EAT
LVS
8% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
47% below
~12%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-21%
1-yr DCF upside
+60%
-8%
5-yr DCF upside
+87%
+16%
10-yr DCF upside
+134%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EAT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
LVS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
EATBrinker International, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $8.9b. Trading near 52-week high of $210.00 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $197.95 (implying -5% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 109% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 4.31 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $32.1b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $70.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $59.07 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.