COMPARE · Reviewed July 8, 2026
EAT vs KTB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. EAT scored 76.8, KTB scored 75.8 — EAT ahead by 1.0.
Compare another pair
EAT
Brinker International, Inc.
76.8
$174.96 · $7.5B
Score gap
1.0
EAT leads
KTB
Kontoor Brands, Inc.
75.8
$84.34 · $4.7B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
EAT
stronger →← stronger
KTB
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
94
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
91
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
EAT is stronger on 1 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
EAT
KTB
$504mC+
FCF
$400mC
+21.9%A-
Rev
+20.9%A-
4.31D
D/E
2.06C
17.1xB+
P/E
17.0xB+
0.89B+
PEG
0.81B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
EAT
KTB
8% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
52% below
-7%
1-yr DCF upside
+64%
+9%
5-yr DCF upside
+109%
+37%
10-yr DCF upside
+200%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
EAT
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
KTB
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
EATBrinker International, Inc.
Why now
Restaurants · market cap $7.5b. 4% off the 52-week high of $181.72. Revenue growing +22%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.89 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $185.89 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 109% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 4.31 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
KTBKontoor Brands, Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $4.7b. 5% off the 52-week high of $88.85. Revenue growing +21%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.81 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.40 (implying +10% upside).
Moat
ROE 45% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 144% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.06 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.