COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

DNOW vs DXPE

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DNOW scored 56.8, DXPE scored 67.0 — DXPE leads.
Compare another set
DNOW
DNOW Inc.
Industrial Distribution · Quality-Growth
56.8
$15.68 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.2
DXPE leads
DXPE
DXP Enterprises, Inc.
Industrial Distribution · Quality-Growth
67
$190.28 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthDNOW+69.8%
  • Strongest balance sheetDNOW0.31
  • Highest qualityDXPE59 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueDNOW-21%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD56.8/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY28.3GROWTH92.5VALUE70.2
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD67.0/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY59.1GROWTH85.8VALUE59.4
DNOWDXPEQuality28.359.1Growth92.585.8Value70.259.4
FCFDNOW$136mDXPE$119m
RevDNOW+69.8%DXPE+11.5%
D/EDNOW0.31DXPE1.66
DNOW
stronger →← stronger
DXPE
28
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
92
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
59
DNOW is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
DNOW
DXPE
$136mC
FCF
$119mC
+69.8%A
Rev
+11.5%B
0.31A-
D/E
1.66C
0.7xA
P/S
PEG
0.55A-
P/E
32.9xC+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
DNOW
DXPE
21% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
22% above
~9%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~16%/yr
-4%
1-yr DCF upside
-32%
+27%
5-yr DCF upside
-18%
+91%
10-yr DCF upside
+9%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
DNOW
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
DXPE
No notable signals flagged.
DNOWDNOW Inc.
Industrial Distribution · $15.68 · beta 0.86
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $2.8b. 9% off the 52-week high of $17.26. Revenue growing +70% — in hypergrowth territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $18.75 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -2.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -5% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
DXPEDXP Enterprises, Inc.
Industrial Distribution · $190.28 · beta 1.01
Why now
Industrial Distribution · market cap $3.0b. 9% off the 52-week high of $208.00. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.55 — paying under fair value for the growth rate.
Moat
ROE 17% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 127% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Net margin 4.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where DNOW and DXPE diverge

On the headline score the gap is 10.2 points in favor of DXPE. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.