COMPARE · Data as of August 25, 2026
DVA vs EHC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DVA scored 68.7, EHC scored 68.1 — DVA leads.
Compare another set
DVA
DaVita Inc.
68.7
$177.80 · $11.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.6
DVA leads
EHC
Encompass Health Corporation
68.1
$120.14 · $11.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDVA15.0x
- Fastest growthEHC+9.5%
- Highest qualityEHC68 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDVA-67%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DVA
stronger →← stronger
EHC
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
73
70
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
63
DVA and EHC split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DVA
EHC
$1.6bC+
FCF
$413mC
+6.4%C+
Rev
+9.5%B
—
D/E
0.82C
15.0xA-
P/E
20.1xA-
0.54A-
PEG
0.41A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DVA
EHC
67% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
16% above
~-16%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~10%/yr
+159%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
+201%
5-yr DCF upside
-14%
+274%
10-yr DCF upside
-2%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DVA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
EHC
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
DVADaVita Inc.
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $11.3b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $247.49 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.54 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $218.43 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 190% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
ROE -111% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
EHCEncompass Health Corporation
Why now
Medical Care Facilities · market cap $11.9b. 6% off the 52-week high of $127.99. PEG 0.41 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $148.17 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DVA and EHC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.6 points in favor of DVA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueDVA 70.3 · EHC 63.1DVA +7.2
- GrowthDVA 67.8 · EHC 73.5EHC +5.7
- QualityDVA 68.0 · EHC 68.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.