COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DTE vs FE
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DTE scored 57.9, FE scored 62.1 — FE leads.
Compare another set
DTE
DTE Energy Company
57.9
$135.22 · $28.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.2
FE leads
FE
FirstEnergy Corp.
62.1
$45.96 · $26.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestFE1.7x
- Fastest growthDTE+16.1%
- Strongest balance sheetFE2.01
- Highest qualityFE55 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DTE
stronger →← stronger
FE
49
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
55
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
82
47
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
FE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DTE
FE
-$1.5bF
FCF
-$1.7bF
+16.1%B+
Rev
+11.3%B
2.29C
D/E
2.01C
2.1xB+
P/S
1.7xA-
1.96C+
PEG
1.68C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
DTE
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
FE
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
DTEDTE Energy Company
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $28.1b. 13% off the 52-week high of $155.75. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $159.46 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
D/E 2.29 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$1.5b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk.
FEFirstEnergy Corp.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $26.6b. 12% off the 52-week high of $52.34. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $53.25 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
D/E 2.01 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Free cash flow is negative (-$1.7b) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 97.8x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DTE and FE diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.2 points in favor of FE. The widest single difference is Quality, where FE leads by 6.4 points.
- QualityDTE 48.9 · FE 55.3FE +6.4
- ValueDTE 47.4 · FE 53.1FE +5.7
- GrowthDTE 83.8 · FE 81.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.