COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DSGX vs INTU
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DSGX scored 72.3, INTU scored 85.0 — INTU leads.
Compare another set
DSGX
The Descartes Systems Group Inc.
72.3
$78.61 · $6.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.7
INTU leads
INTU
Intuit Inc.
85
$370.56 · $101.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestINTU22.6x
- Fastest growthINTU+15.1%
- Strongest balance sheetDSGX0.00
- Highest qualityINTU86 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueINTU-33%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DSGX
stronger →← stronger
INTU
73
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
87
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
90
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
80
INTU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DSGX
INTU
$261mC
FCF
$7.8bB+
+12.0%B
Rev
+15.1%B+
0.00A
D/E
0.33B
39.1xB
P/E
22.6xB+
1.56C+
PEG
0.94B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DSGX
INTU
47% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
33% below
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
-39%
1-yr DCF upside
+29%
-32%
5-yr DCF upside
+50%
-21%
10-yr DCF upside
+85%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DSGX
No notable signals flagged.
INTU
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
DSGXThe Descartes Systems Group Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $6.7b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $109.00 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $99.79 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 159% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 39x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
INTUIntuit Inc.
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $101.4b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $705.08 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.94 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 33 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.02 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 22% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 22% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 169% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DSGX and INTU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.7 points in favor of INTU. The widest single difference is Value, where INTU leads by 20.5 points.
- ValueDSGX 59.6 · INTU 80.1INTU +20.5
- QualityDSGX 72.6 · INTU 85.6INTU +13.0
- GrowthDSGX 87.1 · INTU 89.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.