COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DRVN vs GPI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DRVN scored 58.7, GPI scored 60.8 — GPI leads.
Compare another set
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
58.7
$13.17 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.1
GPI leads
GPI
Group 1 Automotive, Inc.
60.8
$261.85 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestGPI10.8x
- Fastest growthDRVN+7.6%
- Strongest balance sheetGPI1.96
- Highest qualityGPI68 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDRVN-25%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DRVN
stronger →← stronger
GPI
41
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
66
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
DRVN and GPI split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DRVN
GPI
$134mC
FCF
$166mC
+7.6%B
Rev
+0.8%C
2.66C
D/E
1.96C+
13.3xA-
P/E
10.8xA-
0.93B+
PEG
0.33A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DRVN
GPI
25% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+8%
1-yr DCF upside
-1%
+34%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+82%
10-yr DCF upside
+37%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DRVN
No notable signals flagged.
GPI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
DRVNDriven Brands Holdings Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $2.2b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $19.74 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.61 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 2.66 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -15.1%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
GPIGroup 1 Automotive, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.1b. Down 46% from 52-week high of $488.39 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $371.08 (implying +42% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
Down 46% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 1.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DRVN and GPI diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.1 points in favor of GPI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityDRVN 41.0 · GPI 67.8GPI +26.8
- GrowthDRVN 74.3 · GPI 49.7DRVN +24.6
- ValueDRVN 66.3 · GPI 66.7level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.