Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DRVN scored 58.2, ABG scored 65.7 — ABG leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DRVN's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but ABG's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
DRVN
Driven Brands Holdings Inc.
Auto & Truck Dealerships · Quality-Growth
58.2
$11.72 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.5
ABG leads
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Auto & Truck Dealerships · Quality-Growth
65.7
$167.60 · $3.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestABG6.2x
Fastest growthDRVN+6.3%
Strongest balance sheetABG1.41
Highest qualityABG70 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueABG-70%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DRVN
stronger →← stronger
ABG
55
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
59
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
83
ABG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DRVN
ABG
$134mC
FCF
$541mC+
+6.3%C+
Rev
+4.7%C+
2.66C
D/E
1.41C+
11.8xA-
P/E
6.2xA
0.93B+
PEG
0.42A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DRVN
ABG
16% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
70% below
~2%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-23%/yr
+11%
1-yr DCF upside
+226%
+19%
5-yr DCF upside
+230%
+30%
10-yr DCF upside
+237%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DRVN
No notable signals flagged.
ABG
Why this score
Buying back stock
Durable high returns
The companies
DRVNDriven Brands Holdings Inc.
Auto & Truck Dealerships · $11.72 · beta 0.96
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $1.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $17.30 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.93 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $16.09 (implying +37% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
D/E 2.66 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
ABGAsbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Auto & Truck Dealerships · $167.60 · beta 0.78
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.0b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $258.75 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.42 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $245.36 (implying +46% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 106% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
ABG leads DRVN by 7.6 points (70.8 to 63.2), its sharpest advantage coming in PEG (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer DRVN, which trades about 16% below our DCF fair value — a margin of safety the score doesn't reward.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DRVN and ABG diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.5 points in favor of ABG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueDRVN 58.7 · ABG 83.2ABG +24.5
QualityDRVN 55.2 · ABG 69.6ABG +14.4
GrowthDRVN 61.0 · ABG 49.0DRVN +12.0
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is ABG or DRVN the better stock?
ABG scores higher: ABG 65.7, DRVN 58.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do ABG and DRVN differ most?
The widest gap is value, where ABG leads by 25 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are ABG and DRVN scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.