COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

DOX vs NICE

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DOX scored 71.1, NICE scored 82.2 — NICE leads.
Compare another set
DOX
Amdocs Limited
Software - Infrastructure · Quality-Growth
71.1
$61.40 · $6.4B
Score gap
11.1
NICE leads
NICE
NICE Ltd.
Software - Application · Quality-Growth
82.2
$100.24 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestDOX14.6x
  • Fastest growthNICE+7.7%
  • Strongest balance sheetNICE0.02
  • Highest qualityNICE84 / 100
  • Largest discount to fair valueNICE-54%
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD71.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY75.2GROWTH58.2VALUE82.0
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD82.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY83.7GROWTH76.0VALUE87.4
DOXNICEQuality75.283.7Growth58.276.0Value82.087.4
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-8%18%9.6x20xDOXNICE

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFDOX$619mNICE$698m
RevDOX+2.4%NICE+7.7%
D/EDOX0.33NICE0.02
P/EDOX14.6xNICE14.6x
PEGDOX0.78NICE0.75
DOX
stronger →← stronger
NICE
75
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
58
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
82
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
87
NICE is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
DOX
NICE
$619mC+
FCF
$698mC+
+2.4%C
Rev
+7.7%B
0.33B
D/E
0.02A-
14.6xA-
P/E
14.6xA-
0.78A-
PEG
0.75A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
DOX
NICE
37% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
~-5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
+49%
1-yr DCF upside
+92%
+59%
5-yr DCF upside
+119%
+75%
10-yr DCF upside
+165%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
DOX
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
NICE
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
DOXAmdocs Limited
Software - Infrastructure · $61.40 · beta 0.42
Why now
Software - Infrastructure · market cap $6.4b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $88.29 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.78 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $75.94 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. Software economics — recurring revenue, embedded customer workflows, and high gross margin all compound the moat once a base account is won. Switching costs are the lever.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
NICENICE Ltd.
Software - Application · $100.24 · beta 0.04
Why now
Software - Application · market cap $5.9b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $153.68 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.75 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $125.85 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 114% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Software — competitive moat is durable until it isn't; watch net revenue retention, gross margin trends, and any new market entrant with a fundamentally lower price point.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where DOX and NICE diverge

On the headline score the gap is 11.1 points in favor of NICE. The widest single difference is Growth, where NICE leads by 17.8 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.