COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DORM vs LCII
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DORM scored 63.1, LCII scored 63.0 — DORM leads.
Compare another set
DORM
Dorman Products, Inc.
63.1
$132.12 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.1
DORM leads
LCII
LCI Industries
63
$104.42 · $2.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestLCII12.1x
- Fastest growthLCII+4.1%
- Strongest balance sheetDORM0.35
- Highest qualityDORM72 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLCII-43%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DORM
stronger →← stronger
LCII
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
54
69
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
LCII is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DORM
LCII
$214mC
FCF
$287mC
+3.3%C+
Rev
+4.1%C+
0.35A-
D/E
0.80B
18.3xB
P/E
12.1xA-
1.17B+
PEG
1.04B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DORM
LCII
13% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
43% below
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-16%
1-yr DCF upside
+57%
-11%
5-yr DCF upside
+74%
-4%
10-yr DCF upside
+102%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DORM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
LCII
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
DORMDorman Products, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $3.9b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $166.89 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $162.38 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
LCIILCI Industries
Why now
Recreational Vehicles · market cap $2.5b. Down 35% from 52-week high of $159.66 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $129.40 (implying +24% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 136% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 35% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DORM and LCII diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityDORM 72.3 · LCII 65.3DORM +7.0
- GrowthDORM 50.0 · LCII 54.0LCII +4.0
- ValueDORM 69.3 · LCII 70.8level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.