COMPARE · Data as of August 13, 2026
DORM vs GNTX
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DORM scored 63.4, GNTX scored 71.2 — GNTX leads.
Compare another set
DORM
Dorman Products, Inc.
63.4
$133.08 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
7.8
GNTX leads
GNTX
Gentex Corporation
71.2
$23.70 · $5.0B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DORM
stronger →← stronger
GNTX
72
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
86
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
GNTX is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DORM
GNTX
$214mC
FCF
$497mC
+3.3%C+
Rev
+10.1%B
0.35A-
D/E
0.00A
18.5xB
P/E
12.5xA-
1.17B+
PEG
0.72A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DORM
GNTX
13% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
46% below
~8%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
-17%
1-yr DCF upside
+79%
-12%
5-yr DCF upside
+86%
-5%
10-yr DCF upside
+96%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DORM
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
GNTX
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
DORMDorman Products, Inc.
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $3.9b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $166.89 — deep drawdown territory. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $162.38 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 98% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
GNTXGentex Corporation
Why now
Auto Parts · market cap $5.0b. 19% off the 52-week high of $29.38. Revenue growing +10%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.72 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $27.78 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 122% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DORM and GNTX diverge
On the headline score the gap is 7.8 points in favour of GNTX. The widest single difference is Quality, where GNTX leads by 14.0 points.
- QualityDORM 72.2 · GNTX 86.2GNTX +14.0
- ValueDORM 70.5 · GNTX 83.7GNTX +13.2
- GrowthDORM 50.0 · GNTX 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.