COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
DOO vs LEA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DOO scored 59.7, LEA scored 46.0 — DOO leads.
Compare another set
DOO
BRP Inc.
59.7
$62.00 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.7
DOO leads
LEA
Lear Corp
46
$145.52 · $7.3B
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DOO
stronger →← stronger
LEA
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
61
67
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
43
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
DOO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DOO
LEA
$739mC+
FCF
$732mC+
+6.8%C+
Rev
+2.8%C
4.16D
D/E
0.54B+
20.9xB
P/E
14.1xB+
1.62C+
PEG
4.95D
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DOO
LEA
73% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% below
~-17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+185%
1-yr DCF upside
+23%
+275%
5-yr DCF upside
+23%
+459%
10-yr DCF upside
+22%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DOO
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
LEA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
DOOBRP Inc.
Why now
Recreational Vehicles · market cap $4.5b. Down 24% from 52-week high of $81.89 — deep drawdown territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $69.98 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
ROE 47% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 4.16 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 3.4% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
LEALear Corp
Why now
Auto Components · market cap $7.3b. 3% off the 52-week high of $150.33.
Moat
ROE 10% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Net margin 2.3% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.