Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DOCS scored 70.8, WAY scored 62.0 — DOCS leads.
Compare another set
DOCS
Doximity, Inc.
Health Information Services · Quality-Growth
70.8
$30.50 · $5.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.8
DOCS leads
WAY
Waystar Holding Corp.
Health Information Services · Quality-Growth
62
$26.68 · $5.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestDOCS35.9x
Fastest growthWAY+19.2%
Strongest balance sheetDOCS0.01
Highest qualityDOCS88 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DOCS
stronger →← stronger
WAY
88
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
46
70
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
89
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
DOCS and WAY split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DOCS
WAY
$297mC
FCF
$246mC
+13.1%B+
Rev
+19.2%B+
0.01A-
D/E
0.37B
35.9xC+
P/E
38.1xC+
0.59A-
PEG
3.02D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DOCS
WAY
18% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
7% above
~13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-25%
1-yr DCF upside
-20%
-15%
5-yr DCF upside
-7%
0%
10-yr DCF upside
+16%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DOCS
Why this score
Durable high returns
WAY
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
Short track record
The companies
DOCSDoximity, Inc.
Health Information Services · $30.50 · beta 1.22
Why now
Health Information Services · market cap $5.4b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $72.24 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.59 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 18 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $29.67 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 17% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 178% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 36x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
WAYWaystar Holding Corp.
Health Information Services · $26.68 · beta 0.18
Why now
Health Information Services · market cap $5.1b. Down 34% from 52-week high of $40.35 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +19%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $33.77 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
FCF converts 183% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Down 34% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 38x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE 3% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DOCS and WAY diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.8 points in favor of DOCS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityDOCS 87.5 · WAY 46.1DOCS +41.4
GrowthDOCS 69.7 · WAY 88.5WAY +18.8
ValueDOCS 58.2 · WAY 58.3level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is DOCS or WAY the better stock?
DOCS scores higher: DOCS 70.8, WAY 62.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do DOCS and WAY differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where DOCS leads by 41 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are DOCS and WAY scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.