COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DLB vs VRSK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DLB scored 64.8, VRSK scored 69.0 — VRSK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DLB's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but VRSK's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
64.8
$65.27 · $6.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.2
VRSK leads
VRSK
Verisk Analytics, Inc.
69
$187.50 · $24.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDLB27.8x
- Fastest growthDLB+5.9%
- Highest qualityVRSK82 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVRSK-13%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DLB
stronger →← stronger
VRSK
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
71
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
VRSK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DLB
VRSK
$345mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+5.9%C+
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.02A
D/E
—
27.8xB
P/E
28.8xB
1.29B
PEG
1.77C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DLB
VRSK
6% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
13% below
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~5%/yr
+2%
1-yr DCF upside
+1%
+6%
5-yr DCF upside
+15%
+13%
10-yr DCF upside
+39%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DLB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
VRSK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $6.1b. 13% off the 52-week high of $75.39. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $79.00 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 152% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
VRSKVerisk Analytics, Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $24.4b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $273.83 — deep drawdown territory. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $237.71 (implying +27% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. FCF converts 124% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. ROE -78% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DLB and VRSK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.2 points in favor of VRSK. The widest single difference is Quality, where VRSK leads by 8.5 points.
- QualityDLB 73.6 · VRSK 82.1VRSK +8.5
- GrowthDLB 65.0 · VRSK 70.6VRSK +5.6
- ValueDLB 56.9 · VRSK 56.6level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.