COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DLB vs HURN
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DLB scored 64.8, HURN scored 70.8 — HURN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DLB's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but HURN's are as of March 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
64.8
$65.27 · $6.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
6.0
HURN leads
HURN
Huron Consulting Group Inc.
70.8
$161.64 · $2.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestHURN24.4x
- Fastest growthHURN+11.8%
- Strongest balance sheetDLB0.02
- Highest qualityDLB74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDLB-6%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DLB
stronger →← stronger
HURN
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
65
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
87
57
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
61
HURN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DLB
HURN
$345mC
FCF
$124mC
+5.9%C+
Rev
+11.8%B
0.02A
D/E
2.25D
27.8xB
P/E
24.4xB+
1.29B
PEG
1.47B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DLB
HURN
6% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
8% above
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
+2%
1-yr DCF upside
-21%
+6%
5-yr DCF upside
-8%
+13%
10-yr DCF upside
+15%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DLB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
HURN
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $6.1b. 13% off the 52-week high of $75.39. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $79.00 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 152% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
HURNHuron Consulting Group Inc.
Why now
Consulting Services · market cap $2.6b. 13% off the 52-week high of $186.78. Revenue growing +12%, comfortably above the S&P median. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $190.75 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 2.25 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DLB and HURN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 6.0 points in favor of HURN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthDLB 65.0 · HURN 86.6HURN +21.6
- QualityDLB 73.6 · HURN 67.4DLB +6.2
- ValueDLB 56.9 · HURN 60.7HURN +3.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.