COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
AZZ vs DLB
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. AZZ scored 64.7, DLB scored 64.8 — DLB leads.
Compare another set
AZZ
AZZ Inc.
64.7
$141.28 · $4.2B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.1
DLB leads
DLB
Dolby Laboratories, Inc.
64.8
$65.27 · $6.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestAZZ21.5x
- Fastest growthDLB+5.9%
- Strongest balance sheetDLB0.02
- Highest qualityDLB74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDLB-6%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
AZZ
stronger →← stronger
DLB
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
68
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
65
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
57
AZZ is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
AZZ
DLB
$169mC
FCF
$345mC
+5.7%C+
Rev
+5.9%C+
0.39B+
D/E
0.02A
21.5xB+
P/E
27.8xB
1.20B+
PEG
1.29B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
AZZ
DLB
58% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
6% below
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
-42%
1-yr DCF upside
+2%
-37%
5-yr DCF upside
+6%
-28%
10-yr DCF upside
+13%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
AZZ
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
DLB
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
The companies
AZZAZZ Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $4.2b. 13% off the 52-week high of $162.20. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $164.00 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
DLBDolby Laboratories, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Business Services · market cap $6.1b. 13% off the 52-week high of $75.39. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $79.00 (implying +21% upside).
Moat
Net margin 17% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 152% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where AZZ and DLB diverge
The two are effectively level on the headline score. The widest single difference is Quality, where DLB leads by 4.3 points.
- QualityAZZ 69.3 · DLB 73.6DLB +4.3
- GrowthAZZ 67.9 · DLB 65.0level
- ValueAZZ 57.6 · DLB 56.9level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.