COMPARE · Data as of August 27, 2026
DKS vs TPR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DKS scored 67.7, TPR scored 65.7 — DKS leads.
Compare another set
DKS
DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
67.7
$129.66 · $11.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.0
DKS leads
TPR
Tapestry, Inc.
65.7
$131.05 · $26.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDKS13.7x
- Fastest growthDKS+41.2%
- Strongest balance sheetDKS1.39
- Highest qualityTPR82 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DKS
stronger →← stronger
TPR
68
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
82
95
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
48
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
43
DKS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DKS
TPR
$403mC
FCF
$1.8bC+
+41.2%A
Rev
+14.2%B+
1.39C+
D/E
5.72D
13.7xA-
P/E
18.0xB+
1.24B
PEG
1.86C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DKS
TPR
73% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
12% above
~24%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-50%
1-yr DCF upside
-19%
-42%
5-yr DCF upside
-11%
-29%
10-yr DCF upside
+3%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DKS
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Diluting shareholders
TPR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
The companies
DKSDICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $11.6b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $244.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +41% — in hypergrowth territory. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $249.91 (implying +93% upside).
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
TPRTapestry, Inc.
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $26.1b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $164.80 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $167.40 (implying +28% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 119% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
D/E 5.72 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Beta 1.46 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DKS and TPR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.0 points in favor of DKS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityDKS 67.9 · TPR 81.9TPR +14.0
- GrowthDKS 94.6 · TPR 81.1DKS +13.5
- ValueDKS 48.3 · TPR 42.7DKS +5.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.