Is MNSO or DKS the better stock?

MNSO scores higher: MNSO 69.9, DKS 69.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do MNSO and DKS differ most?

The widest gap is quality, where MNSO leads by 24 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. MNSO also leads value, while growth is effectively level between them.

How are MNSO and DKS scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.

COMPARE · Data as of August 25, 2026

DKS vs MNSO

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DKS scored 69.7, MNSO scored 69.9 — MNSO leads.

Compare another set

DKS

DICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.

Specialty Retail · Quality-Growth

69.7

$124.31 · $11.1B

fundamentals as of May 2026

Score gap

0.2

MNSO leads

MNSO

MINISO Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail · Quality-Growth

69.9

$11.26 · $3.4B

At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules

CheapestMNSO11.4x
Fastest growthDKS+41.2%
Strongest balance sheetMNSO1.04
Highest qualityMNSO90 / 100

Side by side · every name on one set of axes

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)

DKS

stronger →← stronger

MNSO

Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet

Growthrevenue & earnings expansion

Valuevaluation vs sector peers

MNSO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.

Fundamentals, head-to-head

DKS

MNSO

$403mC

FCF

—

+41.2%A

Rev

+26.2%A-

1.39C+

D/E

1.04B

12.1xA-

P/E

11.4xA-

1.26B

PEG

0.87B+

Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.

Valuation · DCF cross-check

DKS

MNSO

66% above

Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper

—

~23%/yr

Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in

—

-48%

1-yr DCF upside

—

-40%

5-yr DCF upside

—

-26%

10-yr DCF upside

—

The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.

Model signals

DKS

Why this score

Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
Diluting shareholders

MNSO

Why this score

Short track record
Foreign reporter (CNY)

The companies

DKSDICK'S Sporting Goods, Inc.

Specialty Retail · $124.31 · beta 1.19

Why now

Specialty Retail · market cap $11.1b. Down 49% from 52-week high of $244.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +41% — in hypergrowth territory. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $249.91 (implying +101% upside).

Moat

ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.

Risk

Down 49% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Net margin 4.7% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.

MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail · $11.26 · beta 0.13

Why now

Specialty Retail · market cap $3.4b. Down 57% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.87 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.10 (implying +70% upside).

Moat

Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 25% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.

Risk

Down 57% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.

Verdict — model-derived comparison

MNSO leads DKS by 0.2 points (69.9 to 69.7), its sharpest advantage coming in D/E (grade B). A contrarian could still prefer DKS for its stronger Rev (grade A).

Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.

Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where DKS and MNSO diverge

The two are effectively level on the headline score. The widest single difference is Quality, where MNSO leads by 23.5 points.

QualityDKS 66.4 · MNSO 89.9MNSO +23.5
ValueDKS 53.9 · MNSO 72.1MNSO +18.2
GrowthDKS 94.6 · MNSO 95.7level

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.