COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
DKNG vs LVS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DKNG scored 47.8, LVS scored 68.0 — LVS leads.
Compare another set
DKNG
DraftKings Inc.
47.8
$25.97 · $12.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.2
LVS leads
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
68
$47.03 · $30.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthLVS+18.1%
- Highest qualityLVS92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLVS-48%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DKNG
stronger →← stronger
LVS
26
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
85
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
DKNG and LVS split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DKNG
LVS
$651mC+
FCF
$2.7bB
+15.0%B+
Rev
+18.1%B+
3.36C
D/E
—
2.1xC+
P/S
—
0.11A
PEG
1.12B+
—
P/E
18.2xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DKNG
LVS
27% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
~22%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-40%
1-yr DCF upside
+66%
-22%
5-yr DCF upside
+90%
+13%
10-yr DCF upside
+134%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DKNG
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cyclical growth
LVS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
DKNGDraftKings Inc.
Why now
Gambling · market cap $12.9b. Down 47% from 52-week high of $48.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.11 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 35 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $34.98 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 3.36 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -2.7%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Down 47% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $30.5b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $70.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $59.07 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DKNG and LVS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.2 points in favor of LVS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityDKNG 25.8 · LVS 92.3LVS +66.5
- ValueDKNG 85.0 · LVS 68.0DKNG +17.0
- GrowthDKNG 50.0 · LVS 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.