Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DINO scored 60.7, PBF scored 61.6 — PBF leads.
Compare another set
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · Quality-Growth
60.7
$121.30 · $21.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
0.9
PBF leads
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · Quality-Growth
61.6
$84.27 · $10.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestPBF7.4x
Fastest growthDINO+16.3%
Strongest balance sheetDINO0.32
Highest qualityDINO74 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueDINO-63%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DINO
stronger →← stronger
PBF
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
67
DINO and PBF split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DINO
PBF
$2.3bB
FCF
$743mC+
+16.3%B+
Rev
+13.5%B+
0.32B+
D/E
0.38B+
11.6xB+
P/E
7.4xA-
1.29B
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DINO
PBF
63% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
27% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~1%/yr
+131%
1-yr DCF upside
+21%
+171%
5-yr DCF upside
+37%
+245%
10-yr DCF upside
+63%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $21.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $124.22 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $110.60 (implying -9% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $10.0b. 6% off the 52-week high of $89.48. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $79.62 (implying -6% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Net margin 3.9% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DINO and PBF diverge
On the headline score the gap is 0.9 points in favor of PBF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
ValueDINO 60.3 · PBF 67.4PBF +7.1
QualityDINO 74.1 · PBF 69.3DINO +4.8
GrowthDINO 50.0 · PBF 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PBF or DINO the better stock?
PBF scores higher: PBF 61.6, DINO 60.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PBF and DINO differ most?
The widest gap is value, where PBF leads by 7 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are PBF and DINO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.