COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
DINO vs PBF
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DINO scored 37.7, PBF scored 66.5 — PBF leads.
Compare another set
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
37.7
$97.32 · $17.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
28.8
PBF leads
PBF
PBF Energy Inc.
66.5
$73.53 · $8.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestPBF6.4x
- Fastest growthPBF+13.5%
- Strongest balance sheetDINO0.32
- Highest qualityDINO74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDINO-54%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DINO
stronger →← stronger
PBF
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
69
12
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
58
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
85
PBF is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DINO
PBF
$2.3bB
FCF
$743mC+
-36.2%F
Rev
+13.5%B+
0.32A-
D/E
0.38B+
9.3xA-
P/E
6.4xA
1.18B+
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DINO
PBF
54% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% below
~-18%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+141%
1-yr DCF upside
+16%
+116%
5-yr DCF upside
+4%
+85%
10-yr DCF upside
-10%
These two disagree on this pair: the Value pillar ranks cheapness against sector peers, while price-vs-fair-value is an absolute read. A name can be the better value in its sector and still the dearer one on cash flows.
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DINO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
PBF
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
DINOHF Sinclair Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $17.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $97.63 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue -36% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $90.53 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -36% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
PBFPBF Energy Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $8.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $75.68 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $67.23 (implying -9% upside).
Moat
ROE 21% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Trading within 3% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Net margin 3.9% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DINO and PBF diverge
On the headline score the gap is 28.8 points in favor of PBF. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthDINO 12.4 · PBF 50.0PBF +37.6
- ValueDINO 58.4 · PBF 84.8PBF +26.4
- QualityDINO 74.0 · PBF 69.4DINO +4.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.