Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DINO scored 60.7, PARR scored 65.2 — PARR leads.
Compare another set
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · Quality-Growth
60.7
$121.30 · $21.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
4.5
PARR leads
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · Quality-Growth
65.2
$81.89 · $4.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestPARR5.1x
Fastest growthDINO+16.3%
Strongest balance sheetDINO0.32
Highest qualityDINO74 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueDINO-63%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DINO
stronger →← stronger
PARR
74
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
60
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
76
DINO and PARR split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DINO
PARR
$2.3bB
FCF
$412mC
+16.3%B+
Rev
+13.2%B+
0.32B+
D/E
0.56B
11.6xB+
P/E
5.1xA
1.29B
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DINO
PARR
63% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
56% below
~-13%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-10%/yr
+131%
1-yr DCF upside
+101%
+171%
5-yr DCF upside
+128%
+245%
10-yr DCF upside
+173%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $21.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $124.22 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $110.60 (implying -9% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $4.1b. 8% off the 52-week high of $89.45. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $86.71 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
ROE 43% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DINO and PARR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 4.5 points in favor of PARR. The widest single difference is Value, where PARR leads by 15.6 points.
ValueDINO 60.3 · PARR 75.9PARR +15.6
QualityDINO 74.1 · PARR 72.9level
GrowthDINO 50.0 · PARR 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is PARR or DINO the better stock?
PARR scores higher: PARR 65.2, DINO 60.7 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do PARR and DINO differ most?
The widest gap is value, where PARR leads by 16 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. The other two pillars are close enough to call level, so this is the one place they genuinely separate.
How are PARR and DINO scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.