COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CVI vs DINO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVI scored 57.9, DINO scored 37.7 — CVI leads.
Compare another set
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
57.9
$39.51 · $4.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
20.2
CVI leads
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
37.7
$97.32 · $17.3B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDINO9.3x
- Fastest growthCVI+17.9%
- Strongest balance sheetDINO0.32
- Highest qualityDINO74 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCVI-59%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVI
stronger →← stronger
DINO
61
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
74
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
12
64
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
CVI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVI
DINO
$351mC
FCF
$2.3bB
+17.9%B+
Rev
-36.2%F
2.42D
D/E
0.32A-
57.3xC
P/E
9.3xA-
0.71A-
PEG
1.18B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVI
DINO
59% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
54% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-18%/yr
+84%
1-yr DCF upside
+141%
+142%
5-yr DCF upside
+116%
+267%
10-yr DCF upside
+85%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVI
Why this score
- Cut its dividend
- Cyclical growth
DINO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
The companies
CVICVR Energy, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $4.0b. 5% off the 52-week high of $41.67. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this an Underperform with a mean 1-yr target of $31.40 (implying -21% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.42 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Trailing P/E 57.3x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Net margin 0.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
DINOHF Sinclair Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $17.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $97.63 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue -36% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $90.53 (implying -7% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 121% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -36% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CVI and DINO diverge
On the headline score the gap is 20.2 points in favor of CVI. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCVI 50.0 · DINO 12.4CVI +37.6
- QualityCVI 60.8 · DINO 74.0DINO +13.2
- ValueCVI 63.7 · DINO 58.4CVI +5.3
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.