COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
DHI vs MHO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DHI scored 54.5, MHO scored 55.9 — MHO leads.
Compare another set
DHI
D.R. Horton, Inc.
54.5
$145.11 · $40.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.4
MHO leads
MHO
M/I Homes, Inc.
55.9
$151.59 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DHI
stronger →← stronger
MHO
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
67
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
49
42
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
DHI is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DHI
MHO
$3.2bB
FCF
$200mC
-3.5%D+
Rev
-1.6%D+
0.29A-
D/E
0.32A-
13.8xA-
P/E
12.7xA-
1.21B
PEG
0.95B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DHI
MHO
10% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
32% above
~6%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~21%/yr
-1%
1-yr DCF upside
-40%
+12%
5-yr DCF upside
-24%
+32%
10-yr DCF upside
+3%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DHI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Revenue shrinking
- Short track record
MHO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
DHID.R. Horton, Inc.
Why now
Residential Construction · market cap $40.6b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $184.55 — deep drawdown territory. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $164.17 (implying +13% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 105% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
MHOM/I Homes, Inc.
Why now
Residential Construction · market cap $3.9b. 7% off the 52-week high of $163.66. PEG 0.95 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $163.33 (implying +8% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Beta 1.60 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.