Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DEI scored 62.0, CUZ scored 80.0 — CUZ leads.
Compare another set
DEI
Douglas Emmett, Inc.
REIT - Office · Financial strength
70.6Fin
$9.83 · $2.0B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
0.9
DEI leads
CUZ
Cousins Properties Incorporated
REIT - Office · Financial strength
69.7Fin
$27.44 · $4.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthCUZ+16.0%
Strongest balance sheetCUZ0.84
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DEI
CUZ
7.8%A-
Yield
4.6%B+
+1.8%C
Rev
+16.0%B+
1.63C
D/E
0.84B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
The companies
DEIDouglas Emmett, Inc.
REIT - Office · $9.83 · beta 1.21
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $2.0b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $13.98 — deep drawdown territory. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $13.00 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -2.3%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Dividend payout 844% of earnings on a 7.8% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. ROE -2% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CUZCousins Properties Incorporated
REIT - Office · $27.44 · beta 1.18
Why now
REIT - Office · market cap $4.5b. 17% off the 52-week high of $32.95. Revenue growing +16%, comfortably above the S&P median. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $33.55 (implying +22% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Dividend payout 3200% of earnings on a 4.6% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut. Net margin 0.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. ROE 0% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Common questions
Is CUZ or DEI the better stock?
CUZ scores higher: CUZ 80.0, DEI 62.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
How are CUZ and DEI scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.