COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
DECK vs RL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DECK scored 79.7, RL scored 58.7 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
79.7
$91.00 · $12.4B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
21.0
DECK leads
RL
Ralph Lauren Corporation
58.7
$370.82 · $22.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDECK12.9x
- Fastest growthRL+14.7%
- Strongest balance sheetDECK0.21
- Highest qualityDECK96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDECK-29%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DECK
stronger →← stronger
RL
96
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
83
74
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
89
71
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
28
DECK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DECK
RL
$1.1bC+
FCF
$1.1bC+
+7.9%B
Rev
+14.7%B+
0.21A-
D/E
1.10B
12.9xA-
P/E
23.5xC+
1.12B+
PEG
2.00C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DECK
RL
29% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
49% above
~-1%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~18%/yr
+26%
1-yr DCF upside
-39%
+40%
5-yr DCF upside
-33%
+61%
10-yr DCF upside
-23%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
RL
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
The companies
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $12.4b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +35% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
RLRalph Lauren Corporation
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $22.1b. 12% off the 52-week high of $421.60. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $446.71 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
ROE 36% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DECK and RL diverge
On the headline score the gap is 21.0 points in favor of DECK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueDECK 71.3 · RL 27.6DECK +43.7
- GrowthDECK 74.3 · RL 88.8RL +14.5
- QualityDECK 95.7 · RL 82.5DECK +13.2
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.