COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
DECK vs GIL
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DECK scored 79.2, GIL scored 66.0 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
79.2
$99.59 · $13.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
13.2
DECK leads
GIL
Gildan Activewear Inc.
66
$51.46 · $9.5B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DECK
stronger →← stronger
GIL
95
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
53
84
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
76
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
DECK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DECK
GIL
$1.1bC+
FCF
$500mC
+9.8%B
Rev
+10.7%B
0.21A-
D/E
1.49C+
14.2xA-
P/E
30.1xC+
1.21B
PEG
0.50A
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DECK
GIL
20% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
11% below
~2%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
+13%
1-yr DCF upside
-14%
+26%
5-yr DCF upside
+12%
+45%
10-yr DCF upside
+66%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
GIL
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
The companies
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $13.6b. Down 21% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 19% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 41% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
GILGildan Activewear Inc.
Why now
Apparel Manufacturing · market cap $9.5b. Down 30% from 52-week high of $73.70 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.50 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 8 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.13 (implying +62% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 125% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Trailing P/E 30x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.