COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
BIRK vs DECK
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. BIRK scored 66.9, DECK scored 79.7 — DECK leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DECK's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but BIRK's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
BIRK
Birkenstock Holding plc
66.9
$35.64 · $5.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.8
DECK leads
DECK
Deckers Outdoor Corporation
79.7
$91.68 · $12.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDECK13.0x
- Fastest growthBIRK+14.7%
- Strongest balance sheetDECK0.21
- Highest qualityDECK96 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDECK-28%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
BIRK
stronger →← stronger
DECK
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
96
89
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
74
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
71
DECK is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
BIRK
DECK
$362mC
FCF
$1.1bC+
+14.7%B+
Rev
+7.9%B
0.69B+
D/E
0.21A-
16.7xB+
P/E
13.0xA-
1.03B+
PEG
1.12B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
BIRK
DECK
11% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
28% below
~11%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
-12%
1-yr DCF upside
+25%
+12%
5-yr DCF upside
+39%
+59%
10-yr DCF upside
+60%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
BIRK
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
- Foreign reporter (EUR)
DECK
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
BIRKBirkenstock Holding plc
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $5.9b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $53.53 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $54.54 (implying +53% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 14% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
DECKDeckers Outdoor Corporation
Why now
Footwear & Accessories · market cap $12.5b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $125.45 — deep drawdown territory. 21 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $122.81 (implying +34% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 44% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 110% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where BIRK and DECK diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.8 points in favor of DECK. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityBIRK 62.8 · DECK 95.7DECK +32.9
- GrowthBIRK 89.3 · DECK 74.3BIRK +15.0
- ValueBIRK 62.4 · DECK 71.3DECK +8.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.