COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
COCO vs DAR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. COCO scored 65.3, DAR scored 62.4 — COCO leads.
Compare another set
COCO
The Vita Coco Company, Inc.
65.3
$63.35 · $3.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.9
COCO leads
DAR
Darling Ingredients Inc.
62.4
$65.74 · $10.4B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestDAR17.7x
- Fastest growthCOCO+26.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCOCO0.04
- Highest qualityCOCO85 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueDAR-11%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
COCO
stronger →← stronger
DAR
85
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
63
93
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
35
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
COCO is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
COCO
DAR
$124mC
FCF
$971mC+
+26.1%A-
Rev
+14.9%B+
0.04A
D/E
0.79B
35.0xC
P/E
17.7xB+
2.36C
PEG
4.31D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
COCO
DAR
25% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
11% below
~15%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-4%/yr
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
+25%
-20%
5-yr DCF upside
+13%
+1%
10-yr DCF upside
-3%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
COCO
Why this score
- Durable high returns
DAR
No notable signals flagged.
The companies
COCOThe Vita Coco Company, Inc.
Why now
Beverages - Non-Alcoholic · market cap $3.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $85.83 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $83.89 (implying +32% upside).
Moat
Net margin 16% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 28% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 35x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
DARDarling Ingredients Inc.
Why now
Packaged Foods · market cap $10.4b. 6% off the 52-week high of $69.98. Revenue growing +15%, comfortably above the S&P median. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $78.58 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 162% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where COCO and DAR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.9 points in favor of COCO. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCOCO 84.7 · DAR 63.5COCO +21.2
- ValueCOCO 35.4 · DAR 44.3DAR +8.9
- GrowthCOCO 93.0 · DAR 86.4COCO +6.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.