Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. DAL scored 58.4, HAFN scored 60.8 — HAFN leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. DAL's fundamentals are as of September 2026, but HAFN's are as of June 2026 — a 3-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
DAL
Delta Air Lines, Inc.
Airlines · Quality-Growth
58.4
$82.17 · $54.0B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.4
HAFN leads
HAFN
Hafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · Quality-Growth
60.8
$10.72 · $5.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestHAFN8.4x
Fastest growthDAL+14.1%
Strongest balance sheetHAFN0.33
Highest qualityHAFN93 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueHAFN-19%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
DAL
stronger →← stronger
HAFN
64
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
93
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
27
62
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
89
HAFN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
DAL
HAFN
$3.5bB
FCF
$584mC+
+14.1%B+
Rev
-20.5%F
0.97C+
D/E
0.33A-
13.6xA-
P/E
8.4xA
0.21A
PEG
—
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
DAL
HAFN
4% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% below
~11%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
-16%
1-yr DCF upside
+38%
-4%
5-yr DCF upside
+23%
+15%
10-yr DCF upside
+5%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
DAL
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Durable high returns
Cyclical growth
HAFN
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Short track record
The companies
DALDelta Air Lines, Inc.
Airlines · $82.17 · beta 1.34
Why now
Airlines · market cap $54.0b. 14% off the 52-week high of $95.68. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.21 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $101.48 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 15% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 107% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash. $54.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Net margin 4.6% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
HAFNHafnia Limited
Marine Shipping · $10.72 · beta -0.19
Why now
Marine Shipping · market cap $5.7b. Trading near 52-week high of $10.89 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue -20% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Net margin 25% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Revenue contracting -20% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where DAL and HAFN diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.4 points in favor of HAFN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
QualityDAL 64.3 · HAFN 92.7HAFN +28.4
ValueDAL 62.0 · HAFN 89.5HAFN +27.5
GrowthDAL 50.0 · HAFN 27.1DAL +22.9
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is HAFN or DAL the better stock?
HAFN scores higher: HAFN 60.8, DAL 58.4 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do HAFN and DAL differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where HAFN leads by 28 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. Neither name sweeps: they trade the lead across the three pillars, so the comparison is a trade-off rather than one being better on every measure.
How are HAFN and DAL scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.