COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CZR vs LVS
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CZR scored 38.8, LVS scored 68.0 — LVS leads.
Compare another set
CZR
Caesars Entertainment, Inc.
38.8
$29.76 · $6.1B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
29.2
LVS leads
LVS
Las Vegas Sands Corp.
68
$47.03 · $30.5B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthLVS+18.1%
- Highest qualityLVS92 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueLVS-48%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CZR
stronger →← stronger
LVS
46
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
92
34
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
37
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
68
LVS is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CZR
LVS
$610mC+
FCF
$2.7bB
+2.4%C
Rev
+18.1%B+
7.30D
D/E
—
0.5xA-
P/S
—
4.51D
PEG
1.12B+
—
P/E
18.2xB
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CZR
LVS
32% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
48% below
~5%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-6%/yr
+13%
1-yr DCF upside
+66%
+46%
5-yr DCF upside
+90%
+109%
10-yr DCF upside
+134%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CZR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
LVS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Raising its dividend
- Durable high returns
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CZRCaesars Entertainment, Inc.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $6.1b. 4% off the 52-week high of $30.88. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $31.27 (implying +5% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
D/E 7.30 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Currently unprofitable (margin -3.4%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. Beta 1.75 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
LVSLas Vegas Sands Corp.
Why now
Resorts & Casinos · market cap $30.5b. Down 33% from 52-week high of $70.45 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. 19 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $59.07 (implying +26% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. FCF converts 157% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 33% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CZR and LVS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 29.2 points in favor of LVS. The widest single difference is Quality, where LVS leads by 46.7 points.
- QualityCZR 45.6 · LVS 92.3LVS +46.7
- ValueCZR 37.3 · LVS 68.0LVS +30.7
- GrowthCZR 34.4 · LVS 50.0LVS +15.6
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.