Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CWT scored 43.1, OGS scored 67.7 — OGS leads.
Compare another set
CWT
California Water Service Group
Utilities - Regulated Water · Quality-Growth
43.1
$45.94 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
24.6
OGS leads
OGS
ONE Gas, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Gas · Quality-Growth
67.7
$72.50 · $4.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestOGS1.8x
Fastest growthOGS+42.5%
Strongest balance sheetCWT0.93
Highest qualityOGS46 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/S multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CWT
stronger →← stronger
OGS
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
46
40
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
80
44
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
84
OGS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CWT
OGS
-$236mF
FCF
-$173mF
-3.5%D+
Rev
+42.5%A
0.93A-
D/E
0.96A-
2.7xB
P/S
1.8xB+
2.22C
PEG
6.16D
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CWT
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Diluting shareholders
OGS
Why this score
Diluting shareholders
The companies
CWTCalifornia Water Service Group
Utilities - Regulated Water · $45.94 · beta 0.48
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Water · market cap $2.8b. 15% off the 52-week high of $53.82. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $53.75 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$236m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. ROE 8% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
OGSONE Gas, Inc.
Utilities - Regulated Gas · $72.50 · beta 0.63
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $4.6b. Down 20% from 52-week high of $90.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. 9 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $86.17 (implying +19% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$173m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CWT and OGS diverge
On the headline score the gap is 24.6 points in favor of OGS. The widest single difference is Growth, where OGS leads by 40.6 points.
GrowthCWT 39.8 · OGS 80.4OGS +40.6
ValueCWT 44.3 · OGS 84.3OGS +40.0
QualityCWT 45.3 · OGS 45.7level
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is OGS or CWT the better stock?
OGS scores higher: OGS 67.7, CWT 43.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do OGS and CWT differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where OGS leads by 41 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. OGS also leads value, while quality is effectively level between them.
How are OGS and CWT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.