Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CWT scored 43.1, CEPU scored 66.0 — CEPU leads.
Compare another set
CWT
California Water Service Group
Utilities - Regulated Water · Quality-Growth
43.1
$45.94 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
22.9
CEPU leads
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · Quality-Growth
66
$12.64 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
Fastest growthCEPU+13.0%
Strongest balance sheetCEPU0.33
Highest qualityCEPU70 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CWT
stronger →← stronger
CEPU
45
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
70
40
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
86
44
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
86
CEPU is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CWT
CEPU
-$236mF
FCF
$40mC-
-3.5%D+
Rev
+13.0%B+
0.93A-
D/E
0.33A
2.7xB
P/S
—
2.22C
PEG
—
—
P/E
5.5xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CWT
CEPU
—
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
158% above
—
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~34%/yr
—
1-yr DCF upside
-66%
—
5-yr DCF upside
-61%
—
10-yr DCF upside
-54%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CWT
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Diluting shareholders
CEPU
Why this score
Cut its dividend
Foreign reporter (ARS)
The companies
CWTCalifornia Water Service Group
Utilities - Regulated Water · $45.94 · beta 0.48
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Water · market cap $2.8b. 15% off the 52-week high of $53.82. 4 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $53.75 (implying +17% upside).
Moat
Net margin 13% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$236m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. ROE 8% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
CEPUCentral Puerto S.A.
Utilities - Regulated Electric · $12.64 · beta -0.18
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap $1.9b. Down 32% from 52-week high of $18.50 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +13%, comfortably above the S&P median. 5 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $23.81 (implying +88% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 19% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Down 32% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CWT and CEPU diverge
On the headline score the gap is 22.9 points in favor of CEPU. The widest single difference is Growth, where CEPU leads by 46.4 points.
GrowthCWT 39.8 · CEPU 86.2CEPU +46.4
ValueCWT 44.3 · CEPU 86.0CEPU +41.7
QualityCWT 45.3 · CEPU 70.2CEPU +24.9
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is CEPU or CWT the better stock?
CEPU scores higher: CEPU 66.0, CWT 43.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do CEPU and CWT differ most?
The widest gap is growth, where CEPU leads by 46 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. CEPU leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are CEPU and CWT scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.