COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CVX vs VET
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVX scored 56.8, VET scored 65.2 — VET leads.
Compare another set
Different reporting periods. CVX's fundamentals are as of June 2026, but VET's are as of December 2025 — a 6-month gap. Growth, margin and valuation figures below therefore describe different windows and aren't strictly like-for-like.
CVX
Chevron Corporation
56.8
$205.27 · $402.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.4
VET leads
VET
Vermilion Energy Inc.
65.2
$12.73 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthVET+14.1%
- Strongest balance sheetCVX0.19
- Highest qualityCVX66 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueVET-92%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVX
stronger →← stronger
VET
66
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
65
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
100
CVX and VET split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVX
VET
$26.9bA
FCF
$1.0bC+
+11.2%B
Rev
+14.1%B+
0.19A-
D/E
0.63B
19.8xC+
P/E
—
0.79A-
PEG
—
—
P/S
1.5xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVX
VET
22% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
92% below
~3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
decline
-9%
1-yr DCF upside
+848%
-18%
5-yr DCF upside
+1146%
-29%
10-yr DCF upside
+1762%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVX
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Cyclical growth
VET
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
- Foreign reporter (CAD)
The companies
CVXChevron Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $402.7b. 4% off the 52-week high of $214.71. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.79 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $217.88 (implying +6% upside).
Moat
ROE 11% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined. $402.7b market cap places it among the largest companies in the sector — distribution, R&D, and customer-acquisition costs amortize across a base peers can't replicate.
Risk
Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
VETVermilion Energy Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $1.9b. 14% off the 52-week high of $14.82. Revenue growing +14%, comfortably above the S&P median.
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -37.0%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -29% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CVX and VET diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.4 points in favor of VET. The widest single difference is Value, where VET leads by 44.6 points.
- ValueCVX 55.4 · VET 100.0VET +44.6
- QualityCVX 66.1 · VET 64.7level
- GrowthCVX 50.0 · VET 50.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.