COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
ABG vs CVNA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. ABG scored 69.7, CVNA scored 67.9 — ABG leads.
Compare another set
ABG
Asbury Automotive Group, Inc.
69.7
$214.81 · $3.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.8
ABG leads
CVNA
Carvana Co.
67.9
$69.91 · $104.0B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestABG8.0x
- Fastest growthCVNA+54.0%
- Strongest balance sheetCVNA1.11
- Highest qualityABG69 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueABG-76%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
ABG
stronger →← stronger
CVNA
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
68
58
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
85
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
49
ABG is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
ABG
CVNA
$669mC+
FCF
$929mC+
+4.1%C+
Rev
+54.0%A
1.41C+
D/E
1.11B
8.0xA
P/E
37.0xC
0.60A-
PEG
0.98B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
ABG
CVNA
76% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
377% above
~-23%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~58%/yr
+263%
1-yr DCF upside
-84%
+323%
5-yr DCF upside
-79%
+430%
10-yr DCF upside
-69%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
ABG
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
CVNA
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
The companies
ABGAsbury Automotive Group, Inc.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $3.9b. 18% off the 52-week high of $263.38. PEG 0.60 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 10 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $254.20 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 131% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Net margin 2.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
CVNACarvana Co.
Why now
Auto & Truck Dealerships · market cap $104.0b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $97.38 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +54% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $82.83 (implying +18% upside).
Moat
ROE 39% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $104.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Beta 3.49 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Trailing P/E 37x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
ABG leads CVNA by 1.5 points (69.7 to 68.2), its sharpest advantage coming in P/E (grade A). A contrarian could still prefer CVNA for its stronger Rev (grade A). Note they play different roles — ABG screens as value, CVNA screens as growth — so the model rewards different traits for each.
Our AI analyst is busy right now, so this verdict is drawn directly from the pillars, grades and DCF above.
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where ABG and CVNA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 1.8 points in favor of ABG. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthABG 57.9 · CVNA 93.8CVNA +35.9
- ValueABG 84.5 · CVNA 49.0ABG +35.5
- QualityABG 69.1 · CVNA 68.0level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.