COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CVI vs PARR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVI scored 60.7, PARR scored 62.9 — PARR leads.
Compare another set
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
60.7
$38.26 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.2
PARR leads
PARR
Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
62.9
$85.83 · $4.3B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVI
stronger →← stronger
PARR
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
71
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
CVI and PARR split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVI
PARR
$351mC
FCF
$255mC
+17.9%B+
Rev
-2.5%D+
2.45D
D/E
0.87C+
0.5xA
P/S
—
0.71A-
PEG
—
—
P/E
9.7xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVI
PARR
60% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
19% above
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~3%/yr
+90%
1-yr DCF upside
-7%
+151%
5-yr DCF upside
-16%
+279%
10-yr DCF upside
-28%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVI
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
PARR
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Revenue shrinking
The companies
CVICVR Energy, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $3.8b. 8% off the 52-week high of $41.67. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this an Underperform with a mean 1-yr target of $29.40 (implying -23% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.45 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 0.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
PARRPar Pacific Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $4.3b. Trading near 52-week high of $86.34 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. 7 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $83.00 (implying -3% upside).
Moat
ROE 30% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Trading within 1% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.