COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026
CVI vs DINO
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVI scored 60.7, DINO scored 55.3 — CVI leads.
Compare another set
CVI
CVR Energy, Inc.
60.7
$38.26 · $3.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
5.4
CVI leads
DINO
HF Sinclair Corporation
55.3
$92.31 · $16.6B
fundamentals as of
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVI
stronger →← stronger
DINO
63
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
50
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
72
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
51
CVI and DINO split the three pillars evenly.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVI
DINO
$351mC
FCF
$1.4bC+
+17.9%B+
Rev
-44.8%F
2.45D
D/E
0.35A-
0.5xA
P/S
—
0.71A-
PEG
1.36B
—
P/E
8.8xA-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVI
DINO
60% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
2% below
~-7%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-2%/yr
+90%
1-yr DCF upside
+14%
+151%
5-yr DCF upside
+2%
+279%
10-yr DCF upside
-12%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVI
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
DINO
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Revenue shrinking
The companies
CVICVR Energy, Inc.
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $3.8b. 8% off the 52-week high of $41.67. Revenue growing +18%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.71 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this an Underperform with a mean 1-yr target of $29.40 (implying -23% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
D/E 2.45 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Net margin 0.8% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first. Production-cost sensitivity — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the cycle while marginal producers burn it; watch the cost-per-unit trend, not just headline revenue.
DINOHF Sinclair Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing · market cap $16.6b. Trading near 52-week high of $94.22 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue -45% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $85.27 (implying -8% upside).
Moat
ROE 13% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere. FCF converts 113% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Revenue contracting -45% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Trading within 2% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Net margin 4.5% is thin — operating leverage cuts both ways; input-cost inflation or pricing pressure hits the bottom line first.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.