Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CVE scored 55.2, GPOR scored 63.9 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
CVE
Cenovus Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Integrated · Quality-Growth
55.2
$31.39 · $57.9B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
8.7
GPOR leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · Quality-Growth
63.9
$162.66 · $2.9B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
CheapestGPOR6.5x
Fastest growthGPOR+42.5%
Strongest balance sheetCVE0.34
Highest qualityGPOR76 / 100
Largest discount to fair valueGPOR-55%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CVE
stronger →← stronger
GPOR
69
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
76
44
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
65
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
69
GPOR is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CVE
GPOR
$5.2bB+
FCF
$250mC
-8.6%D
Rev
+42.5%A
0.34B+
D/E
0.50B
12.1xB+
P/E
6.5xA
—
PEG
0.69A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CVE
GPOR
37% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
55% below
~-11%/yr
Growth the price impliesyr-1 FCF growth, fading to 4% · lower = less priced in
~-11%/yr
+79%
1-yr DCF upside
+108%
+59%
5-yr DCF upside
+124%
+33%
10-yr DCF upside
+151%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CVE
Why this score
Raising its dividend
Diluting shareholders
Foreign reporter (CAD)
GPOR
Why this score
Cyclical growth
The companies
CVECenovus Energy Inc.
Oil & Gas Integrated · $31.39 · beta 0.60
Why now
Oil & Gas Integrated · market cap $57.9b. 8% off the 52-week high of $34.16. Revenue -9% — in contraction; any catalyst that reverses this triggers re-rating.
Moat
Net margin 12% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 21% is above 15% — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 112% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash.
Risk
Revenue contracting -9% — the operational turn is not yet visible in the top line. Commodity exposure — earnings power tracks the price of the underlying commodity, not management execution. A 15-20% move in the commodity reprices the equity well before fundamentals catch up.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Oil & Gas E&P · $162.66 · beta 0.56
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $2.9b. Down 28% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +43% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.69 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $213.31 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 36% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CVE and GPOR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 8.7 points in favor of GPOR. The widest single difference is Quality, where GPOR leads by 7.1 points.
QualityCVE 69.1 · GPOR 76.2GPOR +7.1
GrowthCVE 43.5 · GPOR 50.0GPOR +6.5
ValueCVE 65.3 · GPOR 68.5GPOR +3.2
Pillars run 0–100. Value is judged against each company's own sector, so a Value score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.
Common questions
Is GPOR or CVE the better stock?
GPOR scores higher: GPOR 63.9, CVE 55.2 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.
Where do GPOR and CVE differ most?
The widest gap is quality, where GPOR leads by 7 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. GPOR leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.
How are GPOR and CVE scored?
Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.
How current is this comparison?
The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.