COMPARE · Data as of October 9, 2026

CUBE vs TRNO

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CUBE scored 69.0, TRNO scored 74.0 — TRNO leads.
Compare another set
CUBE
CubeSmart
REIT - Industrial · Financial strength
66.9Fin
$37.97 · $8.6B
fundamentals as of
Strength gap
7.2
TRNO leads
TRNO
Terreno Realty Corporation
REIT - Industrial · Financial strength
74.1Fin
$64.79 · $7.1B
fundamentals as of
  • Fastest growthTRNO+24.5%
  • Strongest balance sheetTRNO0.21
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD66.9/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT66.9
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD74.1/ 100 · FIN STRENGTHPEER MEDIANREIT74.1
YieldCUBE5.7%TRNO3.5%
RevCUBE+5.3%TRNO+24.5%
D/ECUBE1.34TRNO0.21
CUBE
TRNO
5.7%A-
Yield
3.5%B+
+5.3%C+
Rev
+24.5%A-
1.34C+
D/E
0.21A
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CUBECubeSmart
REIT - Industrial · $37.97 · beta 1.04
Why now
REIT - Industrial · market cap $8.6b. 12% off the 52-week high of $43.26. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $43.63 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
Net margin 29% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 12% meets the long-run market sustainable threshold — solid but not differentiated; the durability comes from elsewhere.
Risk
Dividend payout 145% of earnings on a 5.7% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
TRNOTerreno Realty Corporation
REIT - Industrial · $64.79 · beta 1.04
Why now
REIT - Industrial · market cap $7.1b. 18% off the 52-week high of $78.94. Revenue growing +25%, comfortably above the S&P median. 17 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $74.12 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Net margin 77% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma.
Risk
P/S 14.0x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Common questions

Is TRNO or CUBE the better stock?

TRNO scores higher: TRNO 74.0, CUBE 69.0 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

How are TRNO and CUBE scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.