COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CTVA vs RPM
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CTVA scored 42.8, RPM scored 57.6 — RPM leads.
Compare another set
CTVA
Corteva, Inc.
42.8
$82.81 · $55.3B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
14.8
RPM leads
RPM
RPM International Inc.
57.6
$106.36 · $13.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestRPM21.0x
- Fastest growthRPM+6.7%
- Strongest balance sheetCTVA0.19
- Highest qualityRPM66 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CTVA
stronger →← stronger
RPM
59
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
66
42
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
32
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
58
RPM is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CTVA
RPM
$629mC+
FCF
$675mC+
+3.7%C+
Rev
+6.7%C+
0.19B+
D/E
0.89C
49.6xC
P/E
21.0xB
1.31B
PEG
1.80C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CTVA
RPM
241% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
15% above
~37%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~12%/yr
-73%
1-yr DCF upside
-23%
-71%
5-yr DCF upside
-13%
-67%
10-yr DCF upside
+4%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CTVA
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Short track record
RPM
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CTVACorteva, Inc.
Why now
Agricultural Inputs · market cap $55.3b. 9% off the 52-week high of $90.97. 20 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $92.10 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
$55.3b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 50x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates. ROE 4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
RPMRPM International Inc.
Why now
Specialty Chemicals · market cap $13.6b. 17% off the 52-week high of $128.51. 14 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $130.50 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 102% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CTVA and RPM diverge
On the headline score the gap is 14.8 points in favor of RPM. The widest single difference is Value, where RPM leads by 26.0 points.
- ValueCTVA 31.7 · RPM 57.7RPM +26.0
- GrowthCTVA 41.7 · RPM 50.0RPM +8.3
- QualityCTVA 59.3 · RPM 66.2RPM +6.9
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.