COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CIG vs CTRI
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CIG scored 83.0, CTRI scored 57.3 — CIG leads.
Compare another set
CIG
Comp En De Mn Cemig
83
$1.92
Score gap
25.7
CIG leads
CTRI
Centuri Holdings, Inc.
57.3
$21.36 · $2.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthCTRI+25.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCIG0.78
- Highest qualityCTRI38 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CIG
CTRI
$354mC
FCF
-$15mF
+8.1%B
Rev
+25.2%A-
0.78A
D/E
1.08B+
6.2xA
P/E
—
0.33A
PEG
1.01B+
—
P/S
0.6xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Model signals
CIG
No notable signals flagged.
CTRI
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
- Short track record
The companies
CIGComp En De Mn Cemig
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Electric · market cap n/a. Down 30% from 52-week high of $2.76 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.33 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts publish a mean 1-yr target of $2.14 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 18% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 26% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Down 30% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Dividend payout 80% of earnings on a 9.2% yield — distribution coverage is thin; one earnings stumble could force a dividend cut.
CTRICenturi Holdings, Inc.
Why now
Utilities - Regulated Gas · market cap $2.2b. Down 50% from 52-week high of $42.98 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +25% — in hypergrowth territory. 6 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $31.75 (implying +49% upside).
Moat
Higher-variance name — the moat signals on the quantitative card are modest, so the durability case rests on execution (turning current growth into durable earnings power) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than an entrenched competitive position.
Risk
Free cash flow is negative (-$15m) — capital raises or debt issuance likely required; dilution / leverage risk. Trailing P/E 64.7x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Down 50% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.