COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026

CSCO vs DGII

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CSCO scored 60.7, DGII scored 61.9 — DGII leads.
Compare another set
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Communication Equipment · Quality-Growth
60.7
$111.04 · $437.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
1.2
DGII leads
DGII
Digi International Inc.
Communication Equipment · Quality-Growth
61.9
$74.91 · $2.8B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestCSCO33.3x
  • Fastest growthDGII+20.3%
  • Strongest balance sheetDGII0.17
  • Highest qualityCSCO77 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD60.7/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY77.1GROWTH72.0VALUE40.3
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD61.9/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY58.9GROWTH81.1VALUE49.5
CSCODGIIQuality77.158.9Growth72.081.1Value40.349.5
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-1%30%28x64xCSCODGII

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFCSCO$11.8bDGII$136m
RevCSCO+9.2%DGII+20.3%
D/ECSCO0.59DGII0.17
P/ECSCO33.3xDGII59.5x
PEGCSCO1.02DGII0.98
CSCO
stronger →← stronger
DGII
77
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
59
72
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
81
40
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
50
DGII is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CSCO
DGII
$11.8bA-
FCF
$136mC
+9.2%B
Rev
+20.3%A-
0.59C+
D/E
0.17B+
33.3xB
P/E
59.5xC
1.02B+
PEG
0.98B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CSCO
DGII
128% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
3% above
~27%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~11%/yr
-59%
1-yr DCF upside
-18%
-56%
5-yr DCF upside
-3%
-52%
10-yr DCF upside
+24%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CSCO
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
DGII
Why this score
  • Diluting shareholders
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
Communication Equipment · $111.04 · beta 1.00
Why now
Communication Equipment · market cap $437.7b. 15% off the 52-week high of $130.37. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $136.05 (implying +23% upside).
Moat
Net margin 20% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 24% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 99% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trailing P/E 33x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
DGIIDigi International Inc.
Communication Equipment · $74.91 · beta 0.97
Why now
Communication Equipment · market cap $2.8b. 14% off the 52-week high of $86.84. Revenue growing +20%, comfortably above the S&P median. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 5 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $85.40 (implying +14% upside).
Moat
Free cash flow runs well ahead of reported net income — non-cash charges (depreciation, intangible amortization) are holding down GAAP earnings while cash generation stays strong.
Risk
Trailing P/E 59.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. ROE 7% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CSCO and DGII diverge

On the headline score the gap is 1.2 points in favor of DGII. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.