COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CRUS vs TER
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CRUS scored 67.0, TER scored 64.1 — CRUS leads.
Compare another set
CRUS
Cirrus Logic, Inc.
67
$115.33 · $5.8B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
2.9
CRUS leads
TER
Teradyne, Inc.
64.1
$375.74 · $58.7B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCRUS14.1x
- Fastest growthTER+57.9%
- Strongest balance sheetTER0.03
- Highest qualityTER90 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCRUS-26%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CRUS
stronger →← stronger
TER
89
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
90
61
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
79
56
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
37
TER is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CRUS
TER
$572mC+
FCF
$800mC+
+6.2%C+
Rev
+57.9%A
0.06A-
D/E
0.03A-
14.1xA
P/E
51.5xC+
9.35D
PEG
0.97B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CRUS
TER
26% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
415% above
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
+30%
1-yr DCF upside
-85%
+35%
5-yr DCF upside
-81%
+41%
10-yr DCF upside
-72%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CRUS
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
TER
Why this score
- Durable high returns
The companies
CRUSCirrus Logic, Inc.
Why now
Semiconductors · market cap $5.8b. Down 36% from 52-week high of $180.42 — deep drawdown territory. 4 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $165.00 (implying +43% upside).
Moat
Net margin 21% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 133% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Down 36% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Semiconductor cyclicality — inventory corrections compress margins faster than analysts model. Monitor channel inventory and book-to-bill ratios as leading indicators.
TERTeradyne, Inc.
Why now
Semiconductor Equipment & Materials · market cap $58.7b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $487.91 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +58% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.97 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 15 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $449.80 (implying +20% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 33% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. $58.7b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Trailing P/E 51.5x prices in sustained high growth — any quarter that disappoints triggers sharp re-rating. Beta 1.79 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. P/S 13.2x embeds aggressive forward growth — disappointing top-line guidance would compress the multiple hard.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CRUS and TER diverge
On the headline score the gap is 2.9 points in favor of CRUS. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- ValueCRUS 55.9 · TER 37.1CRUS +18.8
- GrowthCRUS 60.7 · TER 78.6TER +17.9
- QualityCRUS 88.6 · TER 90.2level
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.