COMPARE · Reviewed July 29, 2026

CRH vs TGLS

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CRH scored 52.5, TGLS scored 62.9 — TGLS leads.
Compare another set
CRH
CRH PLC
Construction · Quality-Growth
52.5
$95.43 · $66.0B
Score gap
10.4
TGLS leads
TGLS
Tecnoglass Inc.
Building Materials · Quality-Growth
62.9
$43.56 · $1.9B
fundamentals as of
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD53/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY67GROWTH57VALUE38
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD63/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY80GROWTH50VALUE62
CRH
stronger →← stronger
TGLS
67
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
80
57
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
38
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
62
TGLS is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CRH
TGLS
$3.0bB
FCF
$7mC-
+6.3%C+
Rev
+9.8%B
0.74B
D/E
0.27B+
18.0xB+
P/E
13.5xA-
2.84C
PEG
0.76A-
Winner per row is the stronger grade in our model; a tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CRH
TGLS
75% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
1371% above
~19%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
>60%/yr
-45%
1-yr DCF upside
-95%
-43%
5-yr DCF upside
-93%
-39%
10-yr DCF upside
-90%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CRH
Why this score
  • Raising its dividend
TGLS
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Raising its dividend
  • Durable high returns
  • Cyclical growth
CRHCRH PLC
Construction · $95.43 · beta 1.33
Why now
Construction · market cap $66.0b. Down 27% from 52-week high of $131.55 — deep drawdown territory.
Moat
ROE 16% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. $66.0b market cap gives the company enough scale to absorb fixed costs that subscale competitors can't, without yet being so large that growth has to come from acquisition.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
TGLSTecnoglass Inc.
Building Materials · $43.56 · beta 1.41
Why now
Building Materials · market cap $1.9b. Down 48% from 52-week high of $83.32 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.76 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 3 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $57.00 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 15% beats the market median by a meaningful margin — the company is keeping more of every revenue dollar than the average S&P constituent. ROE 20% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. Mining moat is reserve quality + extraction cost per unit — top-quartile cost producers generate cash through the commodity cycle while marginal producers burn it.
Risk
Down 48% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.