COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CRC vs RRC
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CRC scored 54.1, RRC scored 66.3 — RRC leads.
Compare another set
CRC
California Resources Corporation
54.1
$53.24 · $4.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
12.2
RRC leads
RRC
Range Resources Corporation
66.3
$41.06 · $9.6B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthRRC+17.3%
- Strongest balance sheetRRC0.22
- Highest qualityRRC89 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueRRC-44%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CRC
stronger →← stronger
RRC
40
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
89
46
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
86
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
65
RRC is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CRC
RRC
$385mC
FCF
$1.4bC+
+4.5%C+
Rev
+17.3%B+
0.40B+
D/E
0.22A-
1.4xB+
P/S
—
0.32A
PEG
1.03B+
—
P/E
11.3xB+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CRC
RRC
42% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
44% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-14%/yr
+46%
1-yr DCF upside
+95%
+72%
5-yr DCF upside
+79%
+119%
10-yr DCF upside
+59%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CRC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
RRC
Why this score
- Raising its dividend
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CRCCalifornia Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $4.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $71.98 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.32 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $77.55 (implying +46% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -3.6%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
RRCRange Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $9.6b. 15% off the 52-week high of $48.31. Revenue growing +17%, comfortably above the S&P median. 22 sell-side analysts rate this a Hold with a mean 1-yr target of $45.64 (implying +11% upside).
Moat
Net margin 26% sits well above the S&P median (~11%) — suggests structural pricing advantage or cost discipline competitors can't quickly close. ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 158% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Hedge-book exposure — many commodity producers hedge forward production; if the hedge book is concentrated at prices well below spot, the upside the market expects is already locked away.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CRC and RRC diverge
On the headline score the gap is 12.2 points in favor of RRC. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCRC 39.8 · RRC 89.0RRC +49.2
- ValueCRC 86.1 · RRC 65.3CRC +20.8
- GrowthCRC 46.3 · RRC 50.0RRC +3.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.