COMPARE · Data as of August 21, 2026
CRC vs GPOR
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CRC scored 54.1, GPOR scored 64.5 — GPOR leads.
Compare another set
CRC
California Resources Corporation
54.1
$53.24 · $4.7B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
10.4
GPOR leads
GPOR
Gulfport Energy Corporation
64.5
$173.45 · $3.1B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- Fastest growthGPOR+35.2%
- Strongest balance sheetCRC0.40
- Highest qualityGPOR77 / 100
- Largest discount to fair valueCRC-42%
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CRC
stronger →← stronger
GPOR
40
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
77
46
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
50
86
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
70
GPOR is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CRC
GPOR
$385mC
FCF
$250mC
+4.5%C+
Rev
+35.2%A
0.40B+
D/E
0.50B
1.4xB+
P/S
—
0.32A
PEG
0.36A
—
P/E
6.6xA
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CRC
GPOR
42% below
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
41% below
~-3%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~-1%/yr
+46%
1-yr DCF upside
+38%
+72%
5-yr DCF upside
+68%
+119%
10-yr DCF upside
+124%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CRC
Why this score
- Diluting shareholders
GPOR
Why this score
- Cyclical growth
The companies
CRCCalifornia Resources Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $4.7b. Down 26% from 52-week high of $71.98 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.32 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 11 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $77.55 (implying +46% upside).
Moat
Turnaround / out-of-favor name — GAAP-unprofitable for now, so the durability case is forward-looking: it rests on a recovery (margin normalization, a cyclical upturn or restructuring) or an un-monetized asset (IP / network effects / first-mover position) rather than on current reported results.
Risk
Currently unprofitable (margin -3.6%) — path to GAAP profitability is the core thesis risk. ROE -4% is below the long-run sustainable threshold of ~10% — capital efficiency would need to improve for the equity base to compound at the market rate. Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
GPORGulfport Energy Corporation
Why now
Oil & Gas E&P · market cap $3.1b. Down 23% from 52-week high of $225.78 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +35% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.36 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 12 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $227.08 (implying +31% upside).
Moat
Net margin 32% is exceptional — pricing-power territory rare outside premium software, branded staples, and specialty pharma. ROE 27% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which.
Risk
Jurisdictional + permitting risk — mining and extraction operations concentrate exposure to political stability, royalty regimes, and environmental review timelines that can stall production for years.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CRC and GPOR diverge
On the headline score the gap is 10.4 points in favor of GPOR. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- QualityCRC 39.8 · GPOR 76.6GPOR +36.8
- ValueCRC 86.1 · GPOR 70.0CRC +16.1
- GrowthCRC 46.3 · GPOR 50.0GPOR +3.7
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.