COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026

CPRI vs URBN

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPRI scored 32.1, URBN scored 65.3 — URBN leads.
Compare another set
CPRI
Capri Holdings Limited
Luxury Goods · Quality-Growth
32.1
$13.68 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
33.2
URBN leads
URBN
Urban Outfitters, Inc.
Apparel Retail · Quality-Growth
65.3
$76.05 · $6.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestURBN14.3x
  • Fastest growthURBN+11.2%
  • Strongest balance sheetURBN0.46
  • Highest qualityURBN75 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD32.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY44.0GROWTH13.8VALUE54.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD65.3/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY75.0GROWTH85.2VALUE43.7
CPRIURBNQuality44.075.0Growth13.885.2Value54.743.7
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-13%21%9.3x23xCPRIURBN

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFCPRI$83mURBN$150m
RevCPRI-3.5%URBN+11.2%
D/ECPRI9.73URBN0.46
P/ECPRI17.5xURBN14.3x
PEGCPRI0.17URBN1.38
CPRI
stronger →← stronger
URBN
44
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
75
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
85
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
44
URBN is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CPRI
URBN
$83mC-
FCF
$150mC
-3.5%D+
Rev
+11.2%B
9.73D
D/E
0.46B+
17.5xB+
P/E
14.3xA-
0.17A
PEG
1.38B
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CPRI
URBN
21% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
207% above
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~36%/yr
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
-70%
-17%
5-yr DCF upside
-67%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
-64%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CPRI
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
URBN
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
  • Durable high returns
CPRICapri Holdings Limited
Luxury Goods · $13.68 · beta 1.41
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $1.6b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $28.27 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.53 (implying +65% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 9.73 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
URBNUrban Outfitters, Inc.
Apparel Retail · $76.05 · beta 1.25
Why now
Apparel Retail · market cap $6.5b. 10% off the 52-week high of $84.35. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 13 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $87.69 (implying +15% upside).
Moat
ROE 18% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.
Risk
Value re-rating depends on a catalyst. Without one — analyst day, divestiture, margin recovery, capital return — the stock can stay cheap on these multiples for years.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CPRI and URBN diverge

On the headline score the gap is 33.2 points in favor of URBN. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.