COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026
CPRI vs ULTA
Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPRI scored 32.1, ULTA scored 69.4 — ULTA leads.
Compare another set
CPRI
Capri Holdings Limited
32.1
$13.68 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
37.3
ULTA leads
ULTA
Ulta Beauty, Inc.
69.4
$538.76 · $23.2B
fundamentals as of
At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules
- CheapestCPRI17.5x
- Fastest growthULTA+11.3%
- Strongest balance sheetULTA0.89
- Highest qualityULTA84 / 100
Side by side · every name on one set of axes
Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.
The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)
CPRI
stronger →← stronger
ULTA
44
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
84
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
83
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
48
ULTA is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
Fundamentals, head-to-head
CPRI
ULTA
$83mC-
FCF
$1.1bC+
-3.5%D+
Rev
+11.3%B
9.73D
D/E
0.89B
17.5xB+
P/E
20.2xB
0.17A
PEG
1.81C+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
Valuation · DCF cross-check
CPRI
ULTA
21% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
4% above
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~8%/yr
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
-13%
-17%
5-yr DCF upside
-4%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
+11%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
Model signals
CPRI
Why this score
- Buying back stock
ULTA
Why this score
- Buying back stock
- Durable high returns
The companies
CPRICapri Holdings Limited
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $1.6b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $28.27 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.53 (implying +65% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 9.73 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
ULTAUlta Beauty, Inc.
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $23.2b. Down 25% from 52-week high of $714.97 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +11%, comfortably above the S&P median. 24 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $623.42 (implying +16% upside).
Moat
ROE 46% — top-decile capital efficiency. Either pricing leverage, low capital intensity, or aggressive buybacks; the durability story depends on which. FCF converts 95% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Mature compounder — the risk is paying up for quality at a moment when growth is decelerating. Watch for sequential revenue + margin trends; the inflection from "compounder" to "ex-compounder" is hard to spot until the multiple already started compressing.
Verdict — model-derived comparison
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.
Where CPRI and ULTA diverge
On the headline score the gap is 37.3 points in favor of ULTA. They get there differently, though — each leads on a different pillar, so the better pick depends on which you weight.
- GrowthCPRI 13.8 · ULTA 83.3ULTA +69.5
- QualityCPRI 44.0 · ULTA 83.9ULTA +39.9
- ValueCPRI 54.7 · ULTA 47.9CPRI +6.8
Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.