Is MNSO or CPRI the better stock?

MNSO scores higher: MNSO 66.9, CPRI 32.1 out of 100 on the Bull Rankings quality-growth score, which blends business quality, growth and valuation into one number. A higher score means a stronger business at a more reasonable price — it is not a price target or a recommendation.

Where do MNSO and CPRI differ most?

The widest gap is growth, where MNSO leads by 82 points on the 0–100 pillar scale. MNSO leads all three pillars, so the gap is broad rather than a single-measure difference.

How are MNSO and CPRI scored?

Each carries the same 0–100 quality-growth score used everywhere on the site, built from three pillars — quality (profitability and returns on capital), growth (revenue and earnings), and value (what you pay for them) — combined as a geometric mean, so a weak pillar cannot be papered over by a strong one.

How current is this comparison?

The whole universe is re-scored every trading day after the US market close, so the scores and fundamentals here reflect the latest published edition.

COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026

CPRI vs MNSO

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPRI scored 32.1, MNSO scored 66.9 — MNSO leads.

Compare another set

CPRI

Capri Holdings Limited

Luxury Goods · Quality-Growth

32.1

$13.68 · $1.6B

fundamentals as of Jun 2026

Score gap

34.8

MNSO leads

MNSO

MINISO Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail · Quality-Growth

66.9

$11.02 · $3.3B

At a glance · who leads each dimension, on the model's own rules

CheapestMNSO11.1x
Fastest growthMNSO+26.2%
Strongest balance sheetMNSO1.04
Highest qualityMNSO79 / 100

Side by side · every name on one set of axes

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

The model, pillar by pillar (0–100 each)

CPRI

stronger →← stronger

MNSO

Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet

Growthrevenue & earnings expansion

Valuevaluation vs sector peers

MNSO is stronger on 3 of 3 pillars.

Fundamentals, head-to-head

CPRI

MNSO

$83mC-

FCF

—

-3.5%D+

Rev

+26.2%A-

9.73D

D/E

1.04B

17.5xB+

P/E

11.1xA-

0.17A

PEG

0.86B+

Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.

Valuation · DCF cross-check

CPRI

MNSO

21% above

Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper

—

~17%/yr

Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in

—

-32%

1-yr DCF upside

—

-17%

5-yr DCF upside

—

+9%

10-yr DCF upside

—

The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.

Model signals

CPRI

Why this score

Buying back stock

MNSO

Why this score

Short track record
Foreign reporter (CNY)

The companies

CPRICapri Holdings Limited

Luxury Goods · $13.68 · beta 1.41

Why now

Luxury Goods · market cap $1.6b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $28.27 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.53 (implying +65% upside).

Moat

Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.

Risk

D/E 9.73 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.

MNSOMINISO Group Holding Limited

Specialty Retail · $11.02 · beta 0.13

Why now

Specialty Retail · market cap $3.3b. Down 58% from 52-week high of $26.20 — deep drawdown territory. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.86 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Strong Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $19.08 (implying +73% upside).

Moat

ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately.

Risk

Down 58% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up.

Verdict — model-derived comparison

Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds

Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CPRI and MNSO diverge

On the headline score the gap is 34.8 points in favor of MNSO. The widest single difference is Growth, where MNSO leads by 81.9 points.

GrowthCPRI 13.8 · MNSO 95.7MNSO +81.9
QualityCPRI 44.0 · MNSO 79.2MNSO +35.2
ValueCPRI 54.7 · MNSO 71.5MNSO +16.8

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.