COMPARE · Data as of August 24, 2026

CPRI vs FIVE

Verdict: Side-by-side breakdown using the Bull Rankings model. CPRI scored 32.1, FIVE scored 71.2 — FIVE leads.
Compare another set
CPRI
Capri Holdings Limited
Luxury Goods · Quality-Growth
32.1
$13.68 · $1.6B
fundamentals as of
Score gap
39.1
FIVE leads
FIVE
Five Below, Inc.
Specialty Retail · Quality-Growth
71.2
$262.72 · $14.5B
fundamentals as of
  • CheapestCPRI17.5x
  • Fastest growthFIVE+25.9%
  • Strongest balance sheetFIVE0.86
  • Highest qualityFIVE73 / 100
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD32.1/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY44.0GROWTH13.8VALUE54.7
THE BULL RANKINGS SCORECARD71.2/ 100 · BULL SCOREPEER MEDIANQUALITY72.7GROWTH94.3VALUE52.8
CPRIFIVEQuality44.072.7Growth13.894.3Value54.752.8
cheap & fastrevenue growth →← cheaper (lower multiple)-13%36%13x37xCPRIFIVE

Growth against the P/E multiple. Up and to the right is cheaper and faster — the quality-growth idea in one picture. Points beyond the axis are pinned to the edge and marked off-scale rather than allowed to compress everything else.

FCFCPRI$83mFIVE$505m
RevCPRI-3.5%FIVE+25.9%
D/ECPRI9.73FIVE0.86
P/ECPRI17.5xFIVE31.5x
PEGCPRI0.17FIVE0.98
CPRI
stronger →← stronger
FIVE
44
Qualityreturns · margins · balance sheet
73
14
Growthrevenue & earnings expansion
94
55
Valuevaluation vs sector peers
53
FIVE is stronger on 2 of 3 pillars.
CPRI
FIVE
$83mC-
FCF
$505mC+
-3.5%D+
Rev
+25.9%A-
9.73D
D/E
0.86B
17.5xB+
P/E
31.5xC
0.17A
PEG
0.98B+
Winner per row is the stronger grade; where grades tie, the better figure breaks it. A true tie or a missing value shows no highlight.
CPRI
FIVE
21% above
Price vs fair valuelower is cheaper
72% above
~17%/yr
Growth the price implies10-yr FCF · lower = less priced in
~19%/yr
-32%
1-yr DCF upside
-45%
-17%
5-yr DCF upside
-42%
+9%
10-yr DCF upside
-36%
The DCF is a cross-check on intrinsic value, separate from the quality-growth score above.
CPRI
Why this score
  • Buying back stock
FIVE
Why this score
  • Durable high returns
CPRICapri Holdings Limited
Luxury Goods · $13.68 · beta 1.41
Why now
Luxury Goods · market cap $1.6b. Down 52% from 52-week high of $28.27 — deep drawdown territory. PEG 0.17 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 16 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $22.53 (implying +65% upside).
Moat
Moat signals from the quantitative card are modest — profitability and capital efficiency are middle-of-pack. The thesis here depends on softer factors (switching costs, brand, distribution, regulatory protection) not captured by the quality-growth screen.
Risk
D/E 9.73 is elevated — limits strategic flexibility and raises refinancing exposure if rates stay higher for longer. Down 52% from the 52-week high — the market is pricing in something the screen can't see; verify the bear case before sizing up. Beta 1.41 implies above-market volatility — position-size to the drawdowns this name will produce in a market correction, not to its bull-case return.
FIVEFive Below, Inc.
Specialty Retail · $262.72 · beta 0.97
Why now
Specialty Retail · market cap $14.5b. Trading near 52-week high of $263.87 — momentum setup, limited technical margin of safety. Revenue growing +26% — in hypergrowth territory. PEG 0.98 — paying under fair value for the growth rate. 21 sell-side analysts rate this a Buy with a mean 1-yr target of $270.05 (implying +3% upside).
Moat
ROE 19% sits above Buffett's preferred 15% threshold — the equity base is compounding at a rate the market struggles to discount accurately. FCF converts 115% of net income — earnings translate cleanly into cash, a sign that working capital and capex are well-disciplined.
Risk
Trading within 0% of the 52-week high — limited technical margin of safety; a momentum reversal would test conviction. Trailing P/E 32x sits well above the S&P median (~20x) — multiple compression is a real risk if revenue growth decelerates.
Generating verdict… typically 5–10 seconds
Not investment advice. The Bull Rankings publishes a quantitative ranking model and accompanying analysis for general informational purposes only. Nothing on this page is a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security; nothing is personalized to your circumstances, risk tolerance, or tax situation. Investing carries the risk of loss — invest at your own risk and consider consulting a licensed financial professional before acting on anything you read here. See terms and methodology for full disclosures.

Where CPRI and FIVE diverge

On the headline score the gap is 39.1 points in favor of FIVE. The widest single difference is Growth, where FIVE leads by 80.5 points.

Pillars run 0–100 against sector peers, so a score is a statement about a company relative to its own industry rather than to the other name here. A wide Value gap usually means the market already prices the difference in quality or growth — which is the trade-off this comparison comes down to.